<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Fantasy Rankings &#8211; Week 5 QBs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.profootball101.com/fantasy-football/2009-fantasy-rankings-week-5-qbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.profootball101.com</link>
	<description>The Premium NFL Betting and Fantasy Football Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: profootball101</title>
		<link>http://www.profootball101.com/fantasy-football/2009-fantasy-rankings-week-5-qbs/comment-page-1/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>profootball101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profootball101.org/?page_id=4840#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s Flacco for Brees straight up, then yes, I&#039;d absolutely veto it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#39;s Flacco for Brees straight up, then yes, I&#39;d absolutely veto it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profootball101</title>
		<link>http://www.profootball101.com/fantasy-football/2009-fantasy-rankings-week-5-qbs/comment-page-1/#comment-1954</link>
		<dc:creator>profootball101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profootball101.org/?page_id=4840#comment-1954</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s Flacco for Brees straight up, then yes, I&#039;d absolutely veto it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#39;s Flacco for Brees straight up, then yes, I&#39;d absolutely veto it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indywizzard</title>
		<link>http://www.profootball101.com/fantasy-football/2009-fantasy-rankings-week-5-qbs/comment-page-1/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>indywizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profootball101.org/?page_id=4840#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one for you. On what planet is a trade involving Flacco for Brees accepted if you aren&#039;t the team getting Brees? If your league had a veto option and the team with Brees was 1-3 due to injuries(and not actually Brees&#039; production slump the last two weeks) and the team with Flacco was 3-1 and rolling, and you weren&#039;t the team with Flacco, wouldn&#039;t you veto the trade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s one for you. On what planet is a trade involving Flacco for Brees accepted if you aren&#39;t the team getting Brees? If your league had a veto option and the team with Brees was 1-3 due to injuries(and not actually Brees&#39; production slump the last two weeks) and the team with Flacco was 3-1 and rolling, and you weren&#39;t the team with Flacco, wouldn&#39;t you veto the trade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro Football 101 &#187; 2009 Fantasy Booms and Busts - Week 5</title>
		<link>http://www.profootball101.com/fantasy-football/2009-fantasy-rankings-week-5-qbs/comment-page-1/#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Football 101 &#187; 2009 Fantasy Booms and Busts - Week 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profootball101.org/?page_id=4840#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>[...] Warner and the offense had the bye week to correct some of its problems and should come out firing on Sunday. The Texans don&#8217;t pose much of a threat defensively, especially in the secondary, and Fitzgerald, Boldin and Breaston will exploit these mismatches all day long. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Warner and the offense had the bye week to correct some of its problems and should come out firing on Sunday. The Texans don&#8217;t pose much of a threat defensively, especially in the secondary, and Fitzgerald, Boldin and Breaston will exploit these mismatches all day long. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro Football 101 &#187; 2009 Fantasy Rankings - Week 5 TEs</title>
		<link>http://www.profootball101.com/fantasy-football/2009-fantasy-rankings-week-5-qbs/comment-page-1/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Football 101 &#187; 2009 Fantasy Rankings - Week 5 TEs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profootball101.org/?page_id=4840#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>[...] has been Peyton Manning&#8217;s primary target over the past few weeks and has delivered for fantasy owners. He&#8217;ll once again [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been Peyton Manning&#8217;s primary target over the past few weeks and has delivered for fantasy owners. He&#8217;ll once again [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro Football 101 &#187; 2009 Fantasy Rankings - Week 5 WRs</title>
		<link>http://www.profootball101.com/fantasy-football/2009-fantasy-rankings-week-5-qbs/comment-page-1/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Football 101 &#187; 2009 Fantasy Rankings - Week 5 WRs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profootball101.org/?page_id=4840#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>[...] Cardinals have had two weeks to adjust their pass defense after being torched by Peyton Manning for 379 yards and four TDs. It won&#8217;t matter against Johnson however, who is too talented for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cardinals have had two weeks to adjust their pass defense after being torched by Peyton Manning for 379 yards and four TDs. It won&#8217;t matter against Johnson however, who is too talented for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

